Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 17, 2013 23:34:53 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Cole S. on Nov 17, 2013 23:52:40 GMT -5
That's a new one for me, pretty early based on the blades/arms I guess? The downrod looks ridiculously thick lol.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 18, 2013 0:56:57 GMT -5
It's from 1983.
|
|
|
|
Post by Andrew G. on Nov 18, 2013 12:11:19 GMT -5
The downrod looks ridiculously thick lol. Not the downrod, this one's probably the old kludgy-as-efff J-hook-in-box mounting system. |
|
|
|
Post by Cole S. on Nov 18, 2013 20:03:38 GMT -5
The downrod looks ridiculously thick lol. Not the downrod, this one's probably the old kludgy-as-efff J-hook-in-box mounting system. Oh yes that would make sense. It looked a big long for that but I see what you mean. |
|
|
|
Post by Adam D. on Nov 18, 2013 22:27:14 GMT -5
It looks to me like the picture of the fan was cut and pasted onto a photo with a picture of a room that they wanted to use to advertise the fan. Looks like there's background that wasn't cut out around the downrod.. Notice the shadow of the blade on the ceiling how it's obvious sketched (no Motor).. I think It's something called masking or vectorizing.. The old fashioned way when computers weren't right at our fingertips and photoshop didn't exist.. I would imagine they would literately place the ceiling fan image on top of a background image and run them though a xerox copy machine.. The downrod is normal sized..
|
|
