|
|
Post by Jean Lemieux on Feb 1, 2011 23:11:48 GMT -5
Why being so rude with him, it's good what he is doing. He is putting everything back in order with all the videos next to them at the same place. It's a good thing to do to have more views on his videos and often when we do cleaning and reorganizing in the Photobucket album lots of pictures gets lost and they can't be viewed in the archives anymore.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rick M. on Feb 1, 2011 23:47:01 GMT -5
I think that makes about 10 times you've posted these pictures now... Yeah.. stop doing this. It's not like one can't jump back a page or three to see the older additions. I find it easier to look at an updated list of all my fans, with the most recent video posted beneath each fan. I figure it's easier to just make a new post with a complete, updated list of my fans. I do this so it's easier to find the newest addition whether that be a new picture, video, or a whole new fan - you don't waste time going through page by page. What I'll do from now on is just modify the list I just made earlier today - I'll just edit that post so the thread won't appear as 'new.' |
|
|
|
Post by Rick M. on Feb 1, 2011 23:51:05 GMT -5
Why being so rude with him, it's good what he is doing. He is putting everything back in order with all the videos next to them at the same place. It's a good thing to do to have more views on his videos and often when we do cleaning and reorganizing in the Photobucket album lots of pictures gets lot and they can't be viewed in the archives anymore. That's what I was getting at - I don't create new lists to annoy people with the same repetitive pictures, but I just like to have a current list near the newest post. Thanks for understanding.  |
|
|
|
Post by Andrew G. on Feb 2, 2011 0:09:31 GMT -5
Here's an idea: Seeing as you can edit a post as many times as you'd like, why not just continuously edit one single post like I do with my list in the "Your Collection?" thread.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rick M. on Feb 2, 2011 0:10:45 GMT -5
Here's an idea: Seeing as you can edit a post as many times as you'd like, why not just continuously edit one single post like I do with my list in the "Your Collection?" thread. That's what I'll do. Thanks! Sorry for the discrepancy guys. I won't annoy you with the same repetitive pictures anymore.  |
|
|
|
Post by Cole S. on Feb 2, 2011 18:07:45 GMT -5
That's what I'll do. Thanks! Sorry for the discrepancy guys. I won't annoy you with the same repetitive pictures anymore. No problem. We appreciate you contributing very much, but now that you've got a system for editing the existing post it will eliminate the repetitiveness. |
|
|
|
Post by Jimmy P. on Feb 2, 2011 20:03:45 GMT -5
I think you do a Great Job Rick! I know some of us dont have very much ceiling fans in our Collection and That's ok. But It always good to find them a New home. Right now Im trying to Start over and Make a List of my Ceiling fan Collection to see how many i have because you will never know how many fans i might find. |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lemieux on Feb 2, 2011 20:09:16 GMT -5
I thought that the point of posting something in a thread was to make the thread appear as ''new'' so that everyone is aware of the update so it's not ignored and forgotten.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rick M. on Feb 2, 2011 22:22:03 GMT -5
I thought that the point of posting something in a thread was to make the thread appear as ''new'' so that everyone is aware of the update so it's not ignored and forgotten. Well that's true, but figure if someone wants to see the most current video/picture of one of my fans, they now know where to look. |
|
|
|
Post by JW on Feb 2, 2011 23:13:05 GMT -5
I thought that the point of posting something in a thread was to make the thread appear as ''new'' so that everyone is aware of the update so it's not ignored and forgotten. It is. However just because you got something new doesn't mean you have to post your entire photo stash again. Do you know how crazy it would get if, say, David did this? We'd have about 100 pictures every three or four posts and more than likely a site crash. |
|
|
|
Post by Rick M. on Feb 2, 2011 23:33:41 GMT -5
I thought that the point of posting something in a thread was to make the thread appear as ''new'' so that everyone is aware of the update so it's not ignored and forgotten. It is. However just because you got something new doesn't mean you have to post your entire photo stash again. Do you know how crazy it would get if, say, David did this? We'd have about 100 pictures every three or four posts and more than likely a site crash. Yeah, from now on I'll just edit old posts. I don't mean to harm the site! |
|
|
|
Post by JW on Feb 2, 2011 23:36:46 GMT -5
Yeah, from now on I'll just edit old posts. I don't mean to harm the site! Not a problem at all. You're not "harming" anything. I personally would suggest editing your post to update your LIST, but going ahead and adding new pictures (not old ones) to a new post on the thread. Take a look at how David has done his; I think his is the absolute best example of such a thread that we have (currently 26 pages long): ada19851985.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=fans&action=display&thread=4249Hope this helps. |
|
