|
Post by Max C. on Aug 27, 2015 23:05:19 GMT -5
I would have though it was older than that. It's not impossible that this would be an early-90's model. Max I would get that Original please I'm definitely considering it
|
|
|
Post by Noah C on Aug 28, 2015 15:19:26 GMT -5
max i would get that original please I definitely agree with Jeremy on this one.
|
|
|
Post by Max C. on Aug 28, 2015 20:12:48 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Noah C on Aug 29, 2015 17:45:15 GMT -5
On the "any ideas" post, I think possibilities would be -Encon -Heritage -Hampton Bay -MAYBE SMC.
|
|
|
Post by Max C. on Aug 29, 2015 18:17:15 GMT -5
On the "any ideas" post, I think possibilities would be -Encon Possibly. Nope. Take a look at the blade brackets. I highly doubt that. Absolutely not.
|
|
|
Post by Noah C on Aug 30, 2015 15:55:26 GMT -5
On the "any ideas" post, I think possibilities would be -Encon Possibly. Nope. Take a look at the blade brackets. I highly doubt that. Absolutely not. Encon: Probably. Hampton Bay: maybe, as it does have Princeton blade brackets. And who was the Princeton made by again?
|
|
|
Post by Max C. on Sept 6, 2015 13:15:00 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lemieux on Sept 6, 2015 15:49:29 GMT -5
Ah yes that NBA hugger fan. Rona and Réno-Dépôt sold it here around 1998. It's larger than this. More like a 132.
|
|
|
Post by Max C. on Sept 8, 2015 22:11:08 GMT -5
Ah yes that NBA hugger fan. Rona and Réno-Dépôt sold it here around 1998. It's larger than this. More like a 132. Ah, so 48"?
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lemieux on Sept 9, 2015 13:08:24 GMT -5
Ah yes that NBA hugger fan. Rona and Réno-Dépôt sold it here around 1998. It's larger than this. More like a 132. Ah, so 48"? Not 120, 132.
|
|
|
Post by Jordan U on Sept 9, 2015 15:45:16 GMT -5
What did you expect to happen? Don't you know that when you increase the sale price people are more likely to buy it?
Is that supposed to be a spinner? It looks kinda ridiculous! More like a cheapo hugger without its housing..
It says free in the title.. therefore I'd say its free!
No clue..
Wow! Ceiling fans neatly taken apart and displayed.. not spoiling! What an unusual sight..
Ah yes that NBA hugger fan. Rona and Réno-Dépôt sold it here around 1998. It's larger than this. More like a 132. Ah, so 48"? 52"!
|
|
|
Post by Max C. on Sept 9, 2015 22:36:25 GMT -5
Is that supposed to be a spinner? It looks kinda ridiculous! More like a cheapo hugger without its housing.. That is indeed a spinner! It says free in the title.. therefore I'd say its free! Hopefully. Wow! Ceiling fans neatly taken apart and displayed.. not spoiling! What an unusual sight.. That definitely is uncommon...still doesn't justify the price however! Sorry, I don't speak Metric (for the most part). Thank you!
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lemieux on Sept 9, 2015 22:43:49 GMT -5
You better start, the country have been doing so for forty years and you learned it in school.
|
|
|
Post by JW on Sept 10, 2015 0:59:49 GMT -5
You better start, the country have been doing so for forty years and you learned it in school. You don't have to be condescending. The majority of posters on this forum are from the United States where Imperial remains the majority measuring system.
|
|
|
Post by Max C. on Sept 10, 2015 19:40:24 GMT -5
You better start, the country have been doing so for forty years and you learned it in school. The majority of posters on this forum are from the United States where Imperial remains the majority measuring system. Honestly, I do not feel there is any particular need. Jon, you are completely correct in your statement. Adding to this, the majority of tradesman and woman here in British Columbia use the Imperial system anyway. An electrician alone (which I'm planning to become) would rarely need to use Metric measurements. For example, all junction boxes list their size in cubic inches (not centimeters) and wire thickness is determined using the American Wire Gauge (AWG). Unless a drastic change occurs, I'm happy with my current comprehension of the Metric system.
|
|